Children's Trust Invalidated As Trustmaker Parents' Alter Ego Designed To Defraud Creditors

Setting up an irrevocable trust for your childrens education after you have already been threatened with a lawsuit, or been sued,  is not a good asset protection. Yet, new clients frequently propose making a educational trust and irrevocably transferring money for the benefit of their children to avoid the parents’ creditors.

I read an article by attorney Jay Adkisson about a Ninth Circuit case where the appeals court set aside a minors trust both as a fraudulent transfer and as the alter-ego of the debtor. Husband and wife  established two separate trusts for their  child’s education trust while they were $5.4 million in debt. The couple filed bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee sought to set aside the trusts as the debtors’ alter egos.

 

The court pointed out that there is a valid planning reason to establish a trust for minor children, the generally acceptable purpose does not  is generally validate a trust set up to avoid creditors. Secondly, the court found that the trust was the alter ego, or same person, as the husband and wife even though they had no beneficial interest in the trust. The court said that although there was an independent trustee the husband in fact dominated  trust decisions and noted that the trusts paid unexplained fees to the husband as trustee. The court said that the husband controlled and benefitted  to the extent that he had an equitable interest in trust property.

It is not sufficient that a child’s trust be set up before creditor problems are in view. The trust must also be administered solely for the child’s benefit and not be used as the parents’ piggy bank. I have heard any clients propose funding a childrens trust but using trust money to pay for household expenses. They seem to believe that as long as the child lives in their home the child’s trust can help pay the mortgage. It does not work. As this case shows, if the trustmaker retains substantial control over the trust and also receives unreasonable fees a court could collapse the trust as the alter ego of the trustmaker parent. In re Schwarzkoph, Case No. 08-56974

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.assetprotectionfl.com/admin/trackback/232049
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.