Asset Protection Planning After A Judgment Is Entered

"Can I still do asset protection planning after there is a judgment against me?" A very common question. The answer is "yes" in many cases. Here’s an example from last week’s clients of legitimate and effective post-judgment planning.

This elderly lady had guaranteed her son’s business loan which the son could not repay when the business failed. The business and loan was made in another state with a national bank. The bank just got a judgment against mother and son for several hundred thousand dollars. The mother lived in Florida in a home with a $40,000 remaining mortgage. She had about $60,000 savings in accounts at the same bank that got the judgment. She lived primarily off monthly checks from her deceased husband’s pension and social security.

Here are the post-judgment planning steps she is considering. First, she pays off her remaining mortgage leaving her with about $20,000 at the creditor bank. Paying a homestead mortgage cannot be reversed under Florida law. Next, she’ll move the financial account from the creditor bank to a small bank in Florida; she is not "hiding" the money, but she is removing the money from the "creditor’s doorstep." The mother’s litigation attorney can probably delay discovery of new bank accounts for a few months after judgment.

Continue Reading...

Sometimes The "Low-Risk Spouse" Gets Sued: Why Effective Asset Protection Is For The Whole Family

Often, a high-risk professional will title all assets in the name of their non-professional spouse as an asset protection plan. The professional thinks they are a lawsuit target, but in the event they are sued, they could tell their adversary that they "have nothing in my name." It’s a simple plan, but it sometimes backfires. Here’s an example where putting everything in the name of low risk spouse did not work out.

A woman physician worked in a high-risk specialty. Her husband worked for a large company in a non-professional job. The couple bought investment real estate and titled all parcels in the husband’s name alone. Their bank accounts were in the husbands name, as were some non-retirement stock accounts. You can probably guess what happened.

The husband called me for asset protection advice because he had been at fault in a serious car accident. He had only $20,000 liability insurance. All of the assets titled in his name, and bought mostly with his wife’s earnings, were at risk. Fortunately, the car he was driving was also in his name only so his wife would not be liable for the car accident. What did they do wrong?

Continue Reading...

Protecting Consideration Received From Partner For Sale of Common Stock In Small Business

A man told me he is liable on several business loans and lines of credit. He is afraid that the bank may either call the loans or demand substantial principal reductions which he cannot afford to pay in today's economy. He personally guaranteed all the business loans. The man owns 50% of the common stock in a profitable corporation. The corporation pays him a small salary and profit distributions. If a bank sues on any of his bank loans and gets a judgment against him the bank could then levy on the stock in his corporation. The non-debtor partner would be in business with the debtor's creditors. The man suggested selling his stock to his partner in consideration for a small cash down payment and a promissory note in order to get the stock out of his name. He intends to invest the cash in his homestead. His plan will not work as intended because the judgment creditor could garnish the note payable by the partner and demand payments from the partner.

Continue Reading...

Liability Traps Under Florida Trust Code: Serving As Trustee of Family Trust Has Risks

Many people in Florida serve as trustees of family trusts where the beneficiaries are other family members and their respective children. Serving without compensation as a trustee for other family members at the bequest of a family trustmaker is not a problem as long as all family members get along. However, when disagreement and dissension arises within the family the job of trustee is a liability trap. Disgruntled family members, sometimes motivated by their spouses, ma

Continue Reading...

Transferring Real Estate To Friendly Buyers In Today's Depressed Market

The real estate collapse has increased the need for asset protection, and in one way, it has made easier some asset protection tools. Many real estate owners seeking to protect unencumbered properties from potential lawsuits from their mortgage lenders ask whether they can transfer title of the free and clear properties to business associates, friends, or even to family members. Transfers of title without fair consideration are subject to reversal as fraudulent conveyances up to four years after the transfer is made. Transfers for reasonably equivalent value are usually protected from allegations of fraudulent transfers. Owners can sell or transfer their properties to anyone as long as the conveyance is in consideration for receipt of reasonable equivalent value. Reasonably equivalent value may or may not be the same as fair market value; some bankruptcy courts have upheld sales at 20 to 30 percent less than fair market value as a transfer for "reasonably equivalent value."

In a depressed real estate market less money need change hands to substantiate a conveyance when market values, and reasonably equivalent values, are depressed Real estate appraisers have told me that the market is almost completely illiquid and that as a result the practical value of many formally valuable properties is close to zero; real estate cannot be sold or financed. People who want to move properties to closely related buyers may be able to sell the properties in consideration for very little money and defend that transfer against fraudulent conveyance allegations in today's market environment.

Continue Reading...

Mortgage Deficiency: Strategy For The Defense

I have previously written that some comsumer protection attorneys have told me that there are many ways to successfully defend a mortgage lender's actions for a mortgage deficiency judgment. The complexity of the modern mortgage lending has made mortgage deficiency suits and the underlying foreclosures more complex for many lenders and thereby easier to defend by skilled attorneys. Last Sunday's N.Y. Times had an article about how one borrower defended a mortgage foreclosure and was able to get the mortgage company to agree to a workable settlement. Link: Fair Game - How One Borrower Beat the Foreclosure Machine - NYTimes.com.

Continue Reading...

Deficiency Judgment More Likely From Second Mortgage

I have often written about mortgage deficiency judgments pointing out that up to now few institutional mortgage lenders are pursuing deficiencies in Florida. Borrowers should distinguish between personal liability on first and second mortgages. When either the first or second mortgage holder forecloses the first mortgage will likely take back the property. The first mortgages gets land which eventually can be sold. The second mortgage holder gets nothing at the foreclosure sale. If the first mortgage holder pursues a deficiency judgment (and again, this is usually not the case), the borrow can defend the action in part by arguing that the mortgagee has been satisfied by its repossession of the property. The borrower does not have this defense against the second mortgage. The second mortgage, having received nothing of value in a foreclosure, can sue on the mortgage note. The second mortgage can simply demand repayment of the promissory note underlying the mortgage without going through a foreclosure proceeding. The property value is irrelevant when the lender sues to collect the note.

Continue Reading...

Liability For Real Estate Taxes After Foreclosure

If you plan to walk away from a house and let your mortgage lender foreclose, do you continue to pay property taxes? This is a question often asked by homeowners who own property worth less than the mortgage balance. People are concerned that they will remain personally liable for unpaid property taxes after the bank foreclosure.

Continue Reading...

Homestead Accounts At Banks

A client sold his homestead and wanted to protect the money in a "homestead account" until he was able to find and purchase a new home. He called me to complain that his bank did not know how to open a "homestead account" and he wanted to know how to protect the sales proceeds. A "homestead account" is a term created through several court decisions; it does not refer to a particular variety of financial account. In the financial world, there is no such animal called a homestead account. Essentially, a homestead account is a personal bank account which is funded exclusively with proceeds from the sale of a Florida homestead. To open a "homestead account" one can open a regular personal bank account which holds homestead sale proceeds and no other money. The bank probably will let you add the words "homestead account" to the account title or description. However, if you ask a bank about a homestead account, rather than a normal personal account, the bank officer probably will not understand what you are talking about.

Deficiency Judgments From Attorney's Perspective

Another attorney weighs in on the issue of mortgage deficiency judgements. An attorney friend of mine who does substantial real estate litigation told me of his recent conversation with an attorney from the Law Offices of Marshall C. Watson. The Watson law firm is one of the biggest foreclosure firms in Florida. www.marshallwatson.com. Their client list includes the biggest banks and mortgage lenders, and the lawyers practice at the center of the real estate and mortgage recession. The Watson attorney stated that his firm has received no requests from its many clients to pursue deficiency judgments after mortgage foreclosure. In this attorney's opinion, a change in policy to go after personal liability for mortgage foreclosures is not on his clients' radar screens. Some cementers to this Blog have expressed the opinion that lender policy will eventually change to pursue or assign deficiency liability. We will see.

Defending Mortgage Foreclosure

There are so many foreclosures and so few attorneys who know how to defend on behalf of the homeowner. I have referred many clients facing foreclosure to an Orlando real estate and commercial litigation attorney named David Cohen. David has had good success defending foreclosures, which often results in giving his clients extra time to remain in their homes while they attempt to resolve the foreclosure case. David recently gave me an overview of his tactics and results fighting foreclosure suits on behalf of clients, many people who were either unable to make payments or who were faced with negative equity.

Continue Reading...

Curing A Late-Filed Subchapter S Election

Asset protection planning often involves forming new corporations or LLCs taxed as Subchapter S entities for income tax purposes. The general rule is that the taxpayer has a limited amount of time to file an S election after forming the corporation or LLC and obtaining a tax identification number. If the taxpayer misses the deadline he cannot qualify for the intended status as an S corporation. I discussed this issue with a prominent Orlando CPA named John Papa recently located in a new office suite in Longwood, Florida. Mr. Papa told me of a relatively new Revenue Procedure which liberalizes the rules for qualification as an S corporation by allowing delinquent corporations to salvage an S election. This rule applies to corporations and to LLCs that elect corporate taxation.

Continue Reading...

How To Borrow Money From Family To Buy A Car

I frequently hear from clients that they purchase a car with money borrowed from a parent, and that they hold title free and clear of all liens. When I explain that their creditors can get at their car even though they feel they owe their parents money they often propose that they now put a lien on the car in favor of their parents. Placing a lien on a car a significant time after the purchase can be deemed a fraudulent conveyance, and in bankruptcy, it could be reversed as a preferential repayment of a loan to an insider. If you are going to borrow money from a family member there are ways to make the transaction defensible against future creditor attack.

Continue Reading...

Bank of America Gets Tough on Credit Card Payments

People who bank at Bank of America and who have credit cards through the same bank are having problems when they don't pay credit card payments. Bank of America, more than most banks, is enforcing a provision in their credit card agreements which allows them to take money out of customers' bank accounts to pay the credit card. They are taking money without any advance notice. No client has asked me to review their Bank of American credit card documents, so I am assuming the bank has a legal contractual basis for their practice.

Continue Reading...

Tenancy By Entireties Property In Other States: Sometimes Exempt And Sometimes Not Exempt

Under Florida law tenants by entireties property is exempt from a creditor's claim against either spouse individually. Prior entries on this blog have explained that tenancy by entireties is not a statutory exemption. Technically, tenants by entireties property is not "exempt" from creditors because it is not one of the bankruptcy exemptions listed in the Florida statutes. Instead, tenancy by entireties is a concept and an immunity created by the common law of Florida court decisions. Sometimes I have consulted with clients who currently reside in other states but are considering moving to Florida. These clients often tell me they own property in their current residence jointly with their spouse, and they want to know if the property is protected. The answer depends on whether the courts of their current residence protect tenants by entireties property from levy and execution. The answer can be tricky in some states.

Continue Reading...

Mortgage Deficiency: Update On Tax Consquences

Mortgage deficiency judgments are main reason people express currently for seeking my asset protection advice. I have previously written on this Blog that most lenders do not pursue mortgage deficiencies and some of the reasons for this policy. I just recently spoke with an attorney who represents many mortgage lenders. He said that lenders continue to be inundated with foreclosures and are having difficulty managing the cases. None of the lenders he works for are pursuing deficiency judgments as a matter of course. Many lenders are planning to send 1099 tax forms to borrowers. The lenders file and send the 1099 forms to document their own tax loss. The borrower who receives a 1099 from a foreclosure must deal with its income tax consequences.

Continue Reading...

Head Of Household Affidavit And Wage Garnishment

Creditors cannot garnish wages of a debtor who is head of household in Florida. I am occasionally asked, as I was this week, whether someone who is facing a possible judgment from a court proceeding needs to file in the same court an affidavit that he his head of household in order to claim the exemption. The answer is "no." The law does not require such affidavit, and moreover, filing a affidavit will not suffice to protect wages from attempted garnishment.

Continue Reading...

Wage Garnishment: Can Debtor Claim Head of Household Exemption in Advance of Garnishment

Some people have sent me emails asking how they can assert an exemption of their salary on the basis that they are head of household. Usually, these questions are sent by debtors owe money for general consumer debts such as credit cards or car repossessions. The readers typically want to know what they have to do to let their creditors know in advance that their wages are exempt from garnishment.

Continue Reading...

Asset Protection Using Reciprocal Irrevocable Trusts

One of my new clients told me about an asset protection tool he implemented upon the advice of another attorney. The attorney had told him the protection was "ironclad." I disagree. The client and his girlfriend each established an irrevocable trust for the benefit of one another. The trusts were identical, and each person funded the trust with the same amount of money. The trust documents had spendthrift provisions which prohibit a creditor from levying upon the interest of the respective beneficiaries. Each person served as trustee of their own trust and had the discretion, but not the requirement, to make distributions of income or principal.

Continue Reading...

Avoiding Wage Garnishment In A Closely Held Small Business

Unmarried debtors who do not support minor children or a spouse are not exempt from wage garnishment. Where such debtor is involved in a closely held small business there may be planning opportunities to protect from garnishment periodic receipts from the business. Small business can pay some of its key personnel either as salaried employees or as independent contractors. The payment method and employment characterization of the key employee may have income tax consequences, and it may also affect the protection of compensation from judgment creditors.

Continue Reading...

Tips To Document Gambling Losses

I don't gamble. Some of my clients who do gamble are facing civil judgments and are concerned about vulnerability of cash in their financial accounts. One such client recently returned from a Las Vegas on a gambling trip and reported that he lost most of the cash he had before the trip. I asked the client how he expected to prove that cash in his account before the trip to Vegas was no longer in his possession and in the possession of Las Vegas casinos.

Continue Reading...

Friends And Family In Florida Asset Protection Planning

Many clients believe that their family members and friends can be part of their asset protection plan. This week one of my clients consulted with me about whether his interest in a wholly owned limited liability company business would be an effective defense against a possible civil judgment against the client for actions unrelated to the operation of the business. The client understood that the creditors's collection remedy against his interest in the LLC would be limited to a charging lien on distributions from the LLC to the client/owner. However, the client was concerned about not being able to receive money earned by the LLC which the client had relied upon to pay personal expenses. The client made several proposals and suggestions about how his friends and family could help him receive money from his limited liability company. These suggestions included, for example, the LLC paying salary to a friend and having the friend pay his personal bills; borrowing money from a family member secured by a lien on LLC distributions but then paying back the loan in cash; selling his LLC interest to a friend for nominal consideration with an unwritten understanding that the client was entitled to profits and loans from the LLC etc, etc.

Continue Reading...

Income Tax Liaibility From Deed In Lieu Or Short Sale

Many real estate investors have serious financial problems due to declining real estate values and credit problems. During the past few months a large portion of my banrkuptcy and asset protection inquiries are from people who find themselves unable to pay mortgages they used to buy investment real estate near the end of the housing bubble. Several of my callers, and people who have become clients, have asked me about the consequences of giving a bank a deed in lieu of foreclosure or selling the property for less than full mortgage balance as part of an agreed "short sale." (A "short sale" is where the bank agrees to accept less than the mortgage balance to release the mortgage in order to facilitate a sale and partial recovery of the loan). One issue that frequently is discussed is the income tax consequences for the borrower from a short sale of deed in lieu as opposed to letting the bank foreclose. Income tax may be imposed for a cancellation of a debt. ("COD") I am not an income tax professional. Recently, I posed the question to my personal CPA, Mr. Lonnie Young of Lake Mary, Florida, and asked him to explain the income tax consequences of giving property back to a mortgage lender.

Continue Reading...

Debtor Pre-Paying His Attorney's Legal Fees

My clients often suggest asset protection techniques that appear clever and effective at first glance, but will not work against an experienced creditor attorney. One such idea is for the debtor to pay his civil litigation attorneys large sums of money in advance of legal services defending the creditor's collection efforts. The theory is that the debtor's money is protected in their attorney's hands under some variation of attorney-client protections. Another reason for this plan is to make sure the debtor can fund his legal defense against collection efforts. This plan is built on incorrect assumptions and will not protect the debtor's money against a skilled collection attorney

Continue Reading...

How To Free Trapped Profits From A Professional LLC

I often get asked how a licensed professional with a money judgment entered against him can get money out of his professional business. If the professional is head of household he can exempt and protect salary paid him from his own business (subject to some conditions). If the professional's business is a professional limited liability company then his creditor cannot levy upon profits, after salary, which are retained in the business, but the creditor could get a charging lien on any profit distributions made from the professional business to the owner. For tax purposes, many professionals would prefer to pay themselves in profit distributions rather than salary, yet with a charging lien profits would be trapped inside the llc.

Continue Reading...

Bank Acounts to Avoid Probate: POD vs. ITF accounts

I received an interesting question about the difference for asset protection purposes between bank accounts titled "ITF", or in trust for, and bank accounts titled "POD", pay on death. An example of each account title would be as follows: "John ITF Mary" and John POD Mary. Both accounts are set up by John and funded with John's money. In both cases, when John dies all the money in the accounts passes to Mary outside of any probate of John's estate. The writer reported that one Florida bank permits only ITF accounts whereas a different Florida bank uses only POD accounts. Does the choice of these two titles make any difference in terms of protecting the money from John's creditors during his lifetime.

Continue Reading...

Is Parent Liable For Accidents of His Adult Child?

No matter how much I think I know about asset protection there is always some new risk of liability that surprises me. A client called me about his car insurance. The client had a child in college in another state. The child had a drivers license in the other state and not in Florida. The same child owned a car in the child's own name. The child had his own car insurance with minimum liability coverage as the parent/client believed liability coverage was not important for a child with no assets. The client's insurance agent said that his own $1m umbrella policy would not cover him unless the child raised his insurance liability limits or the child were insured under the parent's own policy with high liability limits. This seemed illogical because the child was an adult and his ownership and operation of the car was in a totally different part of the country.

Continue Reading...

Timing Annuity and Homestead Purchase Before Moving to Florida

An individual currently resides in a state outside of Florida where he is facing a potential large lawsuit from a business transaction. The individual is considering moving to Florida, purchasing a Florida homestead, and investing cash in annuities which are protected from creditors by Florida statutes. His current state of residence does not afford sufficient protection of either homesteads or annuities. The question posed is the timing of purchasing the annuity and the homestead relative to the time of his move to Florida

Continue Reading...

Fraud Liability For Financial Statements

A client had been sued by bank for default under business promissory note. He stated he was concerned that when he got the loan he submitted to the bank a financial statement that exaggerated his assets. He fears that the creditor will prosecute him for fraud because he submitted a false financial statement to procure a loan. In this case, the loan was secured by collateral.

Continue Reading...

Finding Good Asset Protection Help

People living in states other than Florida occasionally ask for my help in finding asset protection advice in their state. Its not easy. Generally, larger law firms are reluctant to provide asset protection planning for several reasons that I have discussed in previous posts. Attorneys working in asset protection are concentrated in a few states including New York, California, and Florida (because of Florida's liberal homestead laws). People in lesser populated states and in states whose laws provide fewer asset protection options will find it more difficult to get asset protection advice.

Continue Reading...

Affidavits For Florida Asset Protection

A reader was confused about the various affidavits that debtors may need to file in Florida such as the homestead affidavit, head of household affidavit, and affidavits of domicile. A homestead affidavit may be required to qualify for the homestead tax exemption. The homestead affidavit must be filed after you move into your residence prior to January 1 because real estate taxes are based on January 1 tax value and homestead status. That affidavit is not required for homestead asset protection.

Continue Reading...

Homestead Or Annuity Purchase After Lawsuit

A reader asked whether it matters if he purchases a Florida homestead or a Florida annuity before being served with a lawsuit, and whether he could purchase these assets even after a judgment is entered against him. The answer is much different for an annuity and a homestead. The purchase of an annuity is subject to challenge as a fraudulent conversion of assets if the annuity is purchased any time within the four year statute of limitations. The closer the annuity purchase is in time to the lawsuit, the harder it would be for the debtor to defend a fraudulent conversion action after judgment. An annuity purchase after judgment, or even after service of a lawsuit, would be very difficult to defend unless the purchase has clear and strong financial advantage.

Continue Reading...

Tenancy By Entireties Protection of Property Outside of Florida

A husband and wife own an investment real property in Florida as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and a vacation home in Tennessee also titled as husband and wife, tenants with survivorship. Both spouses are Florida residents. Florida law, generally, is that all property owned by married couples as joint tenants with rights of survivorship are presumed to be owned by the entireties. Entireties property is immune from the individual creditors of either spouse. The married couple they presumed both properties are protected from a judgment against the husband only. I advised them that the Florida property is protected, but that the creditor can force the sale of the Tennessee vacation home and claim 50% of the net sale proceeds.

Continue Reading...

A Different Equity Stripping Plan

Equity stripping involves encumbering equity in an asset such as real estate or receivables in order to secure a loan. In some instances equity stripping may not be available because, for instance, the assets sought to be protected are not acceptable to lending institutions as collateral or the debtor's credit does not warrant a loan regardless of the nature of collateral offered. Another problem with standard equity pledging is that the loan proceeds received become a pot of non-exempt cash in the debtor's hands. One of my existing clients presented an interesting variation of equity stripping protection that could work in some otherwise difficult situations.

Continue Reading...

Protection of Inheritance

A person with creditor problems or a money judgment against himself may feel "lucky" if a relative dies and leaves him an inheritance. Yet, the inheritance is an asset as soon as it is determined by a court, or pursuant to a living trust, that the debtor has a beneficial interest. If money is distributed from the decedent to the beneficiary the money is even more accessible to creditors. If the debtor accepts the inheritance and then transfers the money to another non-debtor family member or to a protected asset, such as an annuity, that transfer will be attacked as a fraudulent conveyance subject to reversal. The best situation would be if the decedent had made a bequest to his heirs or beneficiaries in a trust for their benefit rather than outright distributions, assuming the trust document had proper spendthrift language to provide creditor insulation. Unfortunately, the decedent himself usually does not have asset protection concerns at the time the testamentary will or trust is created, and protection of the inheritance from the creditors of one or more of his heirs is not an important estate planning motive.

Continue Reading...

Defendants Can Be Subject To Pre-Judgment Asset Freezes

I've written many time about clients who underestimate their creditors zeal and underestimate the ability of courts to freeze assets during litigation. Most people incorrectly believe that courts can do nothing more in civil cases than issue money judgements, and that creditors have the task of finding and seizing non-exempt assets. Most people also understand that courts can freeze assets though injunctions and temporary restraining orders to stop debtors from transferring their assets after money judgments are entered which give creditors an interest in debtors property.

Recently, I learned of a civil case in federal court where the federal judge took more drastic action to the dismay of the defendant. The court and plaintiff were frustrated by repeated delays on the part of the defendant and his litigation attorney to comply with plaintiff's discovery orders. The court sanctioned the defendant by dismissing his pleadings and entering a default for an amount to be determined later. Even though no amount of damages had been determined and no final judgment against defendant entered, the court ordered the defendant and his controlled business entities not to transfer any assets. This order is not directed to any specific property, but is a restraint on the persons from taking any action to transfer any asset.

Continue Reading...

Benefits of Nevada Corporations

From time to time, and most recently this week, a new asset protection client has previously established LLCs, corporations, or other entities in the State of Nevada. I asked the most recent person why he decided to pay significantly more money to set up an LLC in Nevada. corporation. He said that under Nevada law corporations may issue "bearer shares" whose ownership is established by physical possession. In theory, the client explained, just before a creditor asked under oath about his ownership of investment the stockholder can give the shares to someone else and truthfully testify that he owns no share of stock in any Nevada company because he has relinquished physical possession of the share certificates. This argument sounds better than it would work in the real world.

Continue Reading...

When Annuities Provide Better Asset Protection Than Homestead

The general rule is that when a debtor transfers or converts an exempt asset to another person, or to another form, there is no fraudulent transfer or conversion. If the transfer or conversion is reversed the property would revert to its initial exemption, and there is not harm to creditors from the transfer or conversion of an asset the creditors could not reach in the first place.

People need to be very careful, nevertheless, how they transfer an exempt asset if they foresee future legal problems. For example, Florida statutes protect the proceeds of an annuity. If a debtor sells an annuity and deposits the proceeds in a separate bank account the proceeds remain protected after the annuity sale. A transfer of the annuity proceeds from the bank account should not be a fraudulent transfer.

Proceeds from the sale or refinancing of homestead are treated differently. Pursuant to a Supreme Court decision proceeds from the sale of a homestead are protected only if they are intended to be reinvested in a new homestead within a reasonable time. Otherwise, once homestead equity is converted to cash the cash may be vulnerable to creditors even though the case represents homestead equity.

Continue Reading...

Asset Protection And Estate Planning Interplay

Effective asset protection sometimes contradicts proper estate planning. In Florida and some other states property owned by married couples as tenants by entireties is exempt from creditors with judgments against either spouse individually as long as they are married. An asset protection client could have easily and effectively protected property from future legal problems by transferring his property to joint ownership with his spouse. His problem was that his current spouse was his second marriage, and he had children by his first marriage. His estate plan was to ensure his children from a prior marriage ultimately received a substantial portion of his wealth. I pointed out that if he owned property tenants by entireties with his current wife, in the event he predeceased his wife all jointly owned property would be owned by his surviving spouse regardless of what he put in his will or living trust. At that point, his surviving spouse could leave the property to whomever she wished. She would not be bound by the testamentary intent of the deceased spouse. This person decided not to utilize tenants by entireties because he would lose control over the ultimate disposition of his property and could not protect the interests of his children. His asset protection plan became more complex and expensive as a result.

Continue Reading...

Adding Protection to Single Member LLC

I have received many inquiries about asset protection of a single member LLC. Many attorneys and debtors are concerned about bankruptcy decisions in a few states which have allowed creditors to seize the membership interest of a single member LLC despite statutes in those states which, like Florida statutes, limit creditor remedies to a charging lien. I have previously commented in this Blog that this is an area for Florida debtors to watch, but that planning in Florida should not be dictated by isolated bankruptcy decisions in other states. I often use a medical analogy to explain my views to clients: in medicine, doctors do not immediately change established treatment protocols based on one or two contrary studies or adverse outcomes.

Continue Reading...

Random Interesting Questions

Much of my typical day is spent answering interesting questions from clients and callers. Here are a few that were presented today:

Question: If a debtor owns a life insurance policy on his own life payable to his wife upon death, can a creditor of the debtor get the insurance proceeds upon his death. The answer is no. The life insurance death benefits become property of the non-debtor spouse upon the debtor's death. If the debtor made his estate the beneficiary, or if he failed to designate any beneficiary, then his creditors could attach the death benefit when he died.

Question: if a federal bankruptcy court, or any other federal court, issues a judgment against a Florida debtor other than the debtor filing bankruptcy is the judgment debtor's Florida homestead still protected? In other words, does Florida's homestead protection afforded by state law protect against a judgment of a federal court as well as a state court? The answer is yes. Homestead protection does not distinguish the source of the judgment. Although some federal actions, such as IRS collections or criminal actions can impair homestead protection, civil money judgments from federal or state courts cannot be enforced against the debtor's homestead.

Continue Reading...

Asset Protection Does Not Protect Against All Legal Risk

Asset protection planning is designed to protect debtors against civil money judgments. There are other types of legal liability for which asset protection is less effective including, for instance, court orders which demand that a defendant turn property over to the court or a plaintiff. These orders often come in the form of disgorgement orders or turnover orders. When a defendant is found to have obtained money wrongfully in violation of various federal laws such as regulatory statutes and regulations the court may order the defendant to disgorge the money to the court or the agency. Agencies such as the SEC or FTC frequently seek disgorgement remedies in federal court. Or, bankruptcy trustees frequently seek turnover orders requiring third parties to turn over to the trustee specific funds which the bankruptcy court believes is part of a debtor's bankruptcy estate.

Failure to comply with these civil remedies is punishable by contempt and incarceration. Asset protection planning is less effective against this type of civil liability. The principal defense against civil contempt is impossibility of performance. Offshore trust planning is designed, in part, to afford the impossibility defense to defendants. Offshore trust documents on their face make it impossible for the beneficiary to demand return of funds, yet most offshore planning is not properly or effectively implemented. Other Florida exemptions such as homestead protection, annuities, and tenants by entireties do not provide reliable defenses against civil contempt although they are effective defenses against collection of state court money judgments.

Continue Reading...

Asset Protecting Causes of Action

Asset protection planning often overlooks the value of claims or lawsuits the debtor has against creditors or other third parties. For example, I consulted with a client who owed another state a substantial income tax debt because a large tax shelter was disallowed by the IRS and subsequently the state revenue department. The client had liquidated most of his assets to pay the IRS, but he wanted to protect what he had left from the state. The client had several lawsuits pending against accounting firms, lawyers, and financial firms which issued opinion letters to the effect that the tax shelter was legally valid-- which it was not. The state department, or any other civil creditor, could easily levy upon the client's claims and lawsuits against the third parties who caused his tax liability. Most of any settlement would go to pay taxes. It is very difficult to protect causes of action, in part, because they are matters of public record once filed in a lawsuit. There is little market to sell or encumber a lawsuit whose outcome is uncertain. Any attempted assignment would not survive fraudulent conveyance allegations. Asset protection planning of potential causes of action is best done before litigation is begun.

Finding Relief From A Receiver

Previous post have discussed an aggressive creditor collection tactic to collect judgments against Florida residents from courts outside of Florida. Briefly, the creditors had the foreign court appoint a receiver over the person of the debtor and all his non-exempt personal property. The receiver obtained an order from the foreign court ordering the Florida debtor to appear with his non-exempt personal property in the foreign court house and hand over the property to the debtor. The creditor asked for specific personal property owned by the debtor. When the debtor does appear at the first scheduled hearing with his property, the creditor seeks an order holding the Florida debtor in contempt and ordering his arrest. Two of my clients are currently under this type of receivership attack

Continue Reading...

Landlord Not Covered By Insurance Policy

I spoke with a prospective client who owned rental apartments and who was threatened by one of his tenants with a lawsuit. The tenant alleged he suffered damages because the landlord failed to make repairs to the rental unit which caused the unit to be inhabitable. The tenant said he was suing for emotional distress suffered by his family and would seek punitive damages to teach the landlord a lesson. The client had liability insurance of $3 million. I asked why he needed asset protection if he was insured. The client said his insurance policy did not cover damage from emotional distress or punitive damage awards. The incident illustrates the limits of many insurance policies. Most liability insurance covers damages from negligence, but it may not cover extraordinary damages on theories such emotional distress or punitive damages for intentional wrongs. Your adversaries have no obligation to limit their lawsuits to legal theories covered by your insurance policies, and your insurance company will do whatever it can to exclude your lawsuit from coverage.

How Not To Move To Florida

A Colorado client/defendant had his move to Florida stymied by his creditors. The story is an example of how not to move to Florida. The defendant owned a house and financial accounts in Colorado where a lawsuit against him is pending. No judgment has been entered. The defendant purchased a house in Florida and moved into the Florida house. The Colorado house was put on the market. The creditor found out the client had moved into his Florida homestead.

Even though there was no money judgment against the defendant, the creditor filed a petition with the Colorado court to freeze the defendant's Colorado assets. The court issued an order freezing his financial accounts in Colorado and his Colorado house. The creditor also asked the court to appoint a receiver over the defendant, personally, and all his property whether located in Colorado or Florida. This is the second time this year I have seen a creditor in another state create a receivership over a Florida resident. I have talked to several Florida attorneys about this issue, none of whom believe a Florida court will enforce a foreign receivership. Yet, the client still faces possible contempt of court if he does not appear in Colorado in his receivership case, and enforcement in Florida is undecided.

Continue Reading...

Making Financial Statements Work For You

I received my bank's annual request asking that I redo personal financial statement in order to extend my firm's line of credit. My first reaction was to treat the request an a bureaucratic annoyance; I already supplied copies of my tax returns and the bank knows that my outstanding loan balance is minimal compared to income and assets. Upon further consideration I realized that this annual personal financial statement can play a very positive role in maintenance and substantiation of an asset protection plan, and I appreciated the opportunity to describe my asset ownership to a friendly creditor.

After obtaining a judgment award, one of the first set of documents a creditor seeks from the debtor are all financial statements submitted by the debtor to any lender in recent years. The creditor uses the debtor's own financial statements to discover assets and to show how the debtor previously described the value and ownership of his assets. Most people inflate asset values when submitting financial statements to banks, and more important, most people are not careful to accurately describe the nature of their ownership interest. Creditors demand that debtors explain any discrepancies between assets owned and valued on prior financial statement and the assets otherwise disclosed in depositions in aid of judgment execution. Financial statements to lenders that inflate net worth can themselves undermine otherwise carefully planned asset protection.

Continue Reading...

Tenants by Entireties Can Be Effective Estate Planning

Tenants by entireties may be used for asset protection without diminishing other estate planning goals according to a Private Letter Ruling issued by the IRS late in 2004. Estate planning attorneys typically recommend that spouses divide ownership of property to the extent necessary for each spouse to take advantage of their individual estate tax credit ($1.5 million today). Because tenants by entireties property has the legal property of survivorship all marital assets owned tenants by entireties automatically pass to the surviving spouse. Consequently, the deceased spouse is unable to apply his estate tax credit to property owned during his lifetime with his spouse as T by E. All tenants by entireties is subject to taxation at the death of the second spouse who has available only one estate tax credit to cover all the property. Tenants by entireties is thought to provide good asset protection but poor estate planning. Up until now people with taxable estates had to choose between the asset protection benefits of entireties ownership and the estate tax benefits of separately owned property.

Continue Reading...

Don't Believe Your Own Baloney

My website includes a list of common asset protection mistakes- no mistake is bigger than underestimating creditors and their attorneys. Clients and many professionals are too quick to trust their wealth to the theoretical protections promised by various asset protection tools. Professional planners often suggest plans including various asset protection trusts or limited liability companies because on paper these tools protect against creditor collections. No asset protection tool offers perfect protection in the real world, and planners underestimate the creditors' ability mount arguments against their asset protection devices. Skilled creditor attorneys look for and often find small cracks in asset protections plans which undo the most sophisticated and expensive planning tools. Because most judges tend to be sympathetic to people owed money and less generous to debtors trying to evade debts even a small mistake or technical deficiency in asset protection planning can lead to judicial destruction. Debtors should not believe planners who tell them that a complicated and expensive planning device offers sure protection. Instead, debtors and planners should learn to think like a creditor. They should spend energy trying to figure out how they might attack their own plan focusing more on the weaknesses of asset protection tools rather than their theoretical benefits. My experience taught me that successful asset protection requires that debtors and planners not believe their own baloney.

Debtors' Experience Hiding Cash

Most of my asset protection clients have significant cash warehoused in a bank account or a brokerage money market account. Many clients are often afraid that future creditors will garnish their bank accounts without notice. Often, I am asked if there is something they can do to protect cash accounts from surprise garnishment. I have been unable to offer anything better than the stock answer to "put the cash in the mattress." This past week I met some new clients who seemed skilled in finding places to store cash where it could not be found or garnished by their creditors. I will relay their experiences and recommendations to others without my endorsement or guarantee.

Continue Reading...

Garnishment of Exempt Bank Accounts

Readers of this Blog know how to title their bank accounts so they are protected from judgment creditors. Suppose a married person owns his accounts as tenants by entireties or in the name of a separate legal entity, and the creditor nevertheless issues a writ of garnishment of the bank free temporarily freezing the money in these exempt accounts. What do you do ?

The first thing you should do is file a standard form with the court claiming your right to exempt this money. Better yet, have your lawyer file a motion to dissolve the garnishment. It is important to know that the Florida statutes entitle you to an "immediate" hearing on your motion to dissolve a garnishment. Be prepared to bring copies of bank statements, signature cards, or account agreements to show the judge.

Continue Reading...

Using Prepaid Automobile Leases To Shield Wealth

One of my clients suggested an ingenious way to shelter equity in a motor vehicle which otherwise would be vulnerable to creditors attack. The client proposed to lease an expensive car, and after a few months, pre-pay the majority of lease payments. After three months the client proposed to file bankruptcy.

The leased car would not be an asset subject to creditor attack because it is not property owned by the debtor. The prepayment of lease obligations is not a fraudulent conveyance because the client would be receiving reasonable consideration for the payment in the form of car use. If the client does not file bankruptcy he is free to make prefer one creditor over other creditors and make special arrangements or grant security to the preferred creditor. If the client files bankruptcy the pre-payment of lease obligations more than three months prior to filing would not be a reversible bankruptcy preference.

Continue Reading...

Thoughts About Single Member LLC

Asset protection benefits of a single member limited liability company are often challenged by attorneys who point to the Ashley Albright bankruptcy case where a Colorado bankruptcy judge permitted a trustee to seize the assets of a single member LLC. This case is used as the basis to advise Florida residents against relying on single member LLCs for asset protection.

An attorney colleague, Mr. Gary Forster of Winter Park, makes a good point in rebuttal. Gary argues that prior to 1997 Florida did not allow single member LLCs. At the same time, the state statutes limited creditor collection actions against an LLC interest to charging liens. In 1997, the Florida legislature changed the law to specifically permit a single member LLC, but the legislature did not change the law that limited creditor remedies to charging liens. Gary points out that if the Florida legislature believed that charging lien procedures and protections were any less applicable to a single member LLC it would have made the appropriate amendment when it authorized the single member LLC. By leaving the creditor remedy unchanged, the legislature showed an intent that the single member LLC was the beneficiary of the same protections afforded to all LLCs.

I agree with Mr. Forster that single member LLCs provide effective asset protection under current Florida law, although legal developments on this issue in Florida and other states may change planning recommendations.

LLC Planning and Due on Sale Issues

Asset protection plans which involve real estate include transferring title to real estate parcels to one or several newly created limited liability companies. When the real property being transferred to the LLC is subject to a mortgage these title transfers for asset protection purposes raise the issue of so-called "due on sale" clauses in the mortgage agreement. Clients are often afraid that their asset protection transfers to an LLC will cause their mortgage lender to accelerate the note and mortgage because the mortgage document states that the note is due in full any time title to the property is changed.

When an owner changes title to property to a new entity owned by the same owner where the owner remains liable on the note and there is not diminution in the value of the loan security, there is no additional risk or harm to the lender. In such cases, a due on sale clause amounts to an adhesion contract and arguably a restraint on trade. In any event, as a practical matter, lenders rarely, if ever, detect or enforce a due on sale provision where the borrower changes title to an entity he controls where there is no change in the underlying security.

Continue Reading...

Vulnerability of Out of State Financial Accounts (Part II)

Further thoughts on the same subject. Most of my clients are Florida residents who are threatened with Florida judgments. For these debtors, it makes no difference if their bank has out of state offices. But, for people moving to Florida from another state and who are threatened with lawsuits brought against them in their home state other than Florida, it makes sense to open bank accounts in Florida at local banks who do not have banking offices or branches in their home state. The same advice applies to new accounts at stock brokerage firms, although it may be harder to find a brokerage that does not do business in the state where a judgment is threatened.

Vulnerability of Out of State Financial Accounts

A Florida resident who owns personal property as a general rule may protect that property from creditors with exemptions provided by Florida law. For instance, a securities account owned by a Florida resident debtor jointly with his spouse is protected from the debtor's creditors because the account is presumed to owned tenants by the entireties in Florida. An interesting issue is presented when the debtor who is presently a Florida resident had moved from another state which does not recognize tenants by entireties exemptions, and the debtor had previously opened a joint financial account at his previous residence at a national financial institution with offices in Florida and his home state. In that case, a creditor who had obtained a judgment against the debtor in a court proceeding in the home state may try to garnish the joint financial account in the home state. The debtor would argue that as soon as he became a Florida resident all his joint accounts should be exempt as tenants by entireties accounts. The creditor would argue that the debtor and spouse had no intent on opening an entireties account in his old state because that form of ownership was, and is, unavailable. Additionally, a move to Florida does not stay collection actions by courts in other states against accounts located in their states. If the creditor prevailed in this argument, does that mean than a Florida resident with joint account in a national financial institution may have the account garnished by serving a writ of garnishment at an office of same institution in any state other than Florida?

Continue Reading...

Confusing Offshore Planning With Income Tax Avoidance

client who owns a large motor vehicle distributorship in Central Florida asked me about setting up an offshore company. I often establish offshore limited liability companies in Nevis West Indies for asset protection purposes. When I asked the purpose for this offshore entity, the client said his company has several hundred thousand dollars of receivables which he proposed to sell to the offshore entity at a discount. When the receivables were paid the offshore company would make the profit; the client assumed that profits earned offshore were not taxable to his U.S. dealership or to him personally.

This is another example of a businessman who confuses offshore planning for asset protection with tax planning. Offshore companies when properly used do not shield taxpayers from income taxation on money earned by a company operating in the United States. What this taxpayer had in mind was not tax planning but criminal tax evasion. I reminded the client that he owned and operated a visible and very profitable business which would always be on IRS radar. I encouraged him not to risk his business success to save a few tax dollars. Fortunately, he appeared to appreciate the advise and guidance.

There are no secrets in proper offshore asset protection. All asset protection should be clearly visible. Most importantly, no one should used asset protection techniques, and specifically offshore planning, to save income taxes.

Husband's Homestead Plan Jeopardizes Wife's Assets

A client was contemplating what seemed to be a safe asset transfer that could have inadvertently subjected his wife to personal liability. The client had sold a company for substantial amounts of cash and then put half of the proceeds in a jointly owned investment account. The wife had substantial assets in her own name. Subsequently, the husband was sued. To protect their assets the couple used the joint account proceeds to purchase an expensive Florida homestead.

The homestead is absolutely protected from the husband's creditor. The wife, however, still has problems. The conveyance of the business sales proceeds to the joint account amounts to a fraudulent conveyance to the wife of half of the amount. That the proceeds were invested in a homestead protects the homestead, but it does not cure the original fraudulent conveyance. The husband's creditor may name the wife as a defendant in a fraudulent conveyance action since she is the transferee of one half the amount in the joint account. They will probably get a judgment against the wife for the amount of half the joint account. The wife then will be liable to the husband's creditor to return to the husband and pay the creditor the amount of the judgment. Even though the creditor could not force the sale of the homestead to collect the fraudulent conveyance judgment against the wife, the husband's creditor can attack the wife's separate assets to satisfy the judgment.

Continue Reading...

Delaware Series LLC Bookkeeping Requirements

The Delaware Series LLC is becoming a popular legal tool for asset protection. Delaware Statute 18-215 states that limited liability company may establish or provide for one or more designated series of members, managers, or interest each having separate rights, powers or duties with respect to specified property or LLC obligations. If the LLC operating agreement provides for more than one series then the debts and liabilities with respect to a particular series shall be enforceable against the assets of that particular series and not against the assets of any other series. Each series may have a different business purpose. The liability wall created by the statute theoretically permits an owner of multiple businesses or the owner of several real estate parcels to isolate each in a particular series so that liability with respect to on business or property does not contaminate other assets owned by the same businessman or investor.

Continue Reading...

Liability of Personal Representative in Probate

A personal representative (PR) of a probate estate is liable to creditors or beneficiaries if the PR wrongfully distributes money or applies probate estate property to his personal use. The misuse of probate estate funds is known as "defalcation" which is similar to fraud. One way in which defalcation is different from fraud is that fraud requires showing of fraudulent intent whereas a PR can be liable for defalcation without intent where the misappropriation of estate property was the result of negligence. Good faith is no defense to defalcation

Continue Reading...

Wage Garnishment Where Dependents Reside Outside Florida

The Florida Statutes protect from garnishment wages of a person who is head of household. The amount of wages protected is unlimited. A person is head of household if he provides more than 50% of the support of another person. The public policy of this statute is to protect dependents of the family's biggest wage earner. If wage garnishment were permitted against the person who supports a spouse or children, the theory goes, then the State of Florida and its taxpayers would be responsible to support the dependents of the debtor whose wages were subject to garnishment.

A new client presented the issue of whether the statutory protection against wage garnishment, designed to relieve Florida taxpayers of supporting debtor's dependents, applies where the dependent (in this case, the wife) was a permanent resident of another state. The question was whether both the wage earner debtor and the dependent both have to be Florida residents. When the dependent is a resident of a different state, the policy behind the statute would not apply.

I know of no case directly on this point. My opinion is that wage garnishment protection applies as long as the debtor is a Florida resident. The statute makes no reference to the residency of dependents and has no requirement that the dependents physically reside with the debtor. Attorney Alan Gassman, a very smart asset protection attorney in Tampa, holds the same opinion about this issue which means that it is probably correct.

Offshore Planning Disaster- Initial News Report

The most recent Blog post discussed an actual disaster of several debtors' offshore asset protection plans. All of these debtors had placed money in different offshore accounts all of which were under the management and control of the same attorney in Costa Rica, whose name is Mario Quintana. Mr. Quintana, apparently, was well respected in his community and a local political leader. Today, these clients find themselves without access to their money after the attorney they trusted with their wealth was found dead by suicide last Wednesday. Whether Mr. Quintana killed himself because he had stolen money from his clients' accounts is unknown. The story illustrates the risk of using offshore asset protection. Whether the party in control of offshore funds is an attorney or even a financial institution there is a substantial risk involved in maintaining offshore financial accounts.

The following is the initial newspaper report of Mr. Quintana's suicide from the Tico Times newspaper in Costa Rica.

Continue Reading...

Offshore Disaster !

Two asset protection clients hired me after they had already established offshore corporations. These offshore corporations were located in Central America, and they were headed by a well-established and respected foreign attorney in the jurisdiction. The foreign attorney opened bank accounts for each of the clients' corporations, and the clients transferred large sums of money to these accounts. In order to keep themselves out of control of the offshore corporations, the clients agreed to have the attorney named as signatory on the bank accounts. Only the offshore attorney could access the accounts. Therefore, in theory a U.S. judge could not force the client to withdraw money from the account because the client did not have the legal right to access the account.

This arrangement was working satisfactorily for all clients for an extended period of time. If money was needed, an appropriate request was transmitted through unidentified third parties to the foreign attorney, and the attorney would promptly wire funds.

This week the clients were informed that the foreign attorney in charge of their accounts committed suicide. The clients find themselves without access to their money and with no assurance money is still in their accounts.

Hopefully, the story will not have an unhappy ending, and funds will be located. However, I know of two clients who are not sleeping well this weekend.

Offshore planning seems attractive in theory, but you better have good reason to trust people you put in control of your money.

Homestead Protection of Multi-Family Investment Building

A caller asked me if he could qualify for homestead protection if he bought a four unit building, lived in one unit, and rented out the other three. One principal under Florida case law is that the rental of a room in a homestead property will not disqualify the homestead protection. On the other hand, there is precedent that a property used primarily for commercial purposes may lose homestead protection. The hypothetical presented by the caller has no clear answer in Florida case law. I believe the answer would turn on evidence of the owner's primary purpose. If the building were purchased primarily as a principal residence then homestead should apply. However, if the property were clearly an investment vehicle there is a risk, but not a certainty, that homestead protection could be denied. The purpose of homestead protection from creditors is not to provide a loophole to protect investment properties by occupancy of a small part of the property. The purpose, rather, is to protect the family home. A better tactic of combining residency and investment would be to buy several acres of property from which parts could be subdivided and sold off. In this example, the owner would not be sharing residency simultaneously with unrelated families, and the situation comports more with the intent of homestead protection.

Delaware Series LLC

I spoke with a California attorney today about her client's interest in a Delaware Series LLC. The client was a real estate investor with over 25 different rental properties. The attorney asked whether a Delaware Series LLC was an effective asset protection solution for this client. She indicated that California law makes the charging lien the exclusive remedy for a creditor to attack a debtor's interest in a limited liability company.

A Delaware Series LLC is a special type of limited liability company established in Delaware pursuant to specific Delaware statutes. The distinguishing feature of this type of LLC is that a single LLC can be comprised of two or more "series." The series are similar to subsidiary entities. Each series can own distinct assets. In theory, liability of one series does not affect assets in any separate series or the Series LLC as a whole. In the case of the California client, the client could create a single Delaware Series LLC and register the LLC to do business in California with a California registered agent. Thereafter, each of the 25 different real properties could be owned by a separate series. If any one property generated a lawsuit or liability, only the one parcel of real estate owned by that particular series would be at risk.

Continue Reading...

Protection of FEMA Grants and Claims

I recently was asked during a consultation whether FEMA grants made to hurricane victims are exempt from creditor garnishment. I doubt there is any court decision on this issue inasmuch as this year's weather is so unique and FEMA grants are made to areas designated as major disaster areas.

My guess is that if FEMA money is applied to repair your primary residence the use of the money could not be attacked as a fraudulent conveyance since it would represent money applied to exempt homestead. The more interesting issue is whether a creditor could garnish a debtor's claim or application to FEMA or money awarded by FEMA before the debtor receives the money. I think that, technically, FEMA applications and grants are not exempt from garnishment. However, a court would likely be sympathetic to most debtors who suffered major damage to their home , and courts would probably try to find a way to exempt the claims. For example, FEMA applications and grants made to spouses jointly would be exempt form the creditors of just one spouse as tenants by entireties property.

If a debtor is expecting a FEMA grant which might be garnished by an aggressive creditor, one solution is to borrow repair funds from a bank and pledge the FEMA claim or grant as part of the security for the repair loan. The bank's security interest in the FEMA money would protect that grant or loan proceeds from any creditor. When FEMA is ready to pay the claim, it would pay directly to the bank who is the debtor's assignee of the claim.

Debts Owed To Federal Agencies

Defending collection of civil judgments is the goals of asset protection planning. In most cases, debtors are defending assets from judgments obtained in state court civil proceedings. Asset protection becomes more difficult when the creditor is a federal government agency who obtains a civil judgment in federal court. One reason is that the government agency can obtain from the federal court an order that the debtor show cause why the judgment cannot be paid immediately. If the debtor fails to pay after the court order the debtor may be held in contempt of court. Contempt citations subject the debtor to possible incarceration until some payment is made. Although a debtor cannot be held in a "debtor's prison" to force full payment, the contempt remedy may be used as a powerful collection threat. Contempt orders frequently require some partial payment according to the debtor's income level and available assets to avoid imprisonment.

90 Days

I have received several calls asking whether someone who moves to Florida has to reside here for 90 days before they can take advantage of Florida residency and the Florida homestead exemption. The 90 day time requirement pertains to bankruptcy only. You must be domiciled in Florida for at least 90 days before you can file bankruptcy in Florida. Residency for all other purposes is immediately when you move into your new Florida residence and do other acts which indicate your intent to stay in Florida permanently. There is no 90 day waiting period for becoming a Florida resident for all purposes other than for filing bankruptcy

Proceeds Received From Exempt Assets

I received an inquiry from an out-of-state business person who wants to establish Florida residency to protect himself from anticipated litigation. The question is whether proceeds received from payout by annuities, death benefits of life insurance, or sale of a homestead remain protected after being deposited in his bank account. The answer is different depending on the exempt asset and the language of the Florida statute that exempts the particular asset. Annuity proceeds are expressly exempt under the language of F.S. Proceeds from the sale of a homestead remain protected in the owner's bank accounts if they are traceable and if the owner can show the proceeds are reasonably earmarked for the purchase of a replacement homestead pursuant to court decisions. There is no protection afforded by statutes or by court decisions to proceeds received by a life insurance beneficiary. Death benefits may be attacked by the creditors of the insurance beneficiary after they are paid by the insurance company.

Trusts That Fail To Protect Against Creditors

Trusts may be an effective asset protection tool if properly drafted. Setting up a trust to hold your own property for your own benefit (such as a living trust) provides no asset protection benefits under Florida law. However, if a debtor is a beneficiary of a trust set up by another family member for the debtor's benefit, the debtor's beneficial interest in the trust is protected from the debtor's creditors if the trust agreement has what is referred to as a "spendthrift clause" or "anti-alienation clause." These clauses say, essentially, that a beneficiary may not assign his interest, voluntarily or involuntarily, for the benefit of another party. However, if the trustmaker makes the debtor/beneficiary the successor trustee of the trust so that after the trustmaker's death the beneficiary is wearing the hats of trustee and beneficiary, asset protection benefits of the spendthrift clause may be lost. Spendthrift provisions work, in part, because most trust agreements give the trustee, or successor trustee, discretion over whether or not to distribute trust income and principal to the beneficiaries. The debtor's ability as trustee to make discretionary distributions to himself may subject the debtor to a court order requiring distributions of trust property that may be seized by the debtor's judgement creditors. For the protection of trust beneficiaries, it is better for trust agreements to require successor co-trustees, one of whom must be unrelated to the beneficiary.

Beneficiary as Trustee of Trust: Is Protection Lost?

An attorney asked me about a situation where a parent sets up a trust for the benefit of an adult child and makes the child the trustee of the trust. The trust has typical "spendthrift" provisions which protect the beneficial interest of a trust from the creditors of the trust beneficiary. The attorney inquired whether the spendthrift protection offered by the trust is lost where the beneficiary (child) controls trust assets in his position of trustee.

I found one bankruptcy court decision which supported my colleague's position that the child's (trustee"s) interest would not be protected from creditors. In this case, the judge said:

"Florida law generally recognizes the validity of spendthrift clauses and will allow them against the valid claims of creditors. However, where a beneficiary has the power to control the plan's assets, this dominion over the property is such that the interest is not exempt from claims for payment of debts." 81 B.R. 681.

Continue Reading...

Tenants By Entireties With California Spouse?

A client presented today an interesting question which I can not answer with any certainty. The well-established rule under Florida case law is that tenants by entireties property (property owned jointly by husband and wife) is immune from creditors of either spouse individually, but the property is not protected from joint creditors. This particular client was a Florida resident whose spouse was a California resident. The client (husband) had recently moved to Florida to start new employment, but his wife remained in their California home to continue medical treatment. California is a community property state which does not even recognize the concept of tenants by entireties, not to mention its exemption from creditors.

The husband faced potential lawsuit. The issue was whether a Florida resident married to a non-Florida resident of a community property state. Do both husband and wife have to be Florida residents in order for the Florida debtor to protect marital property? I know of no case law on this issue. In my opinion, the husband's property located in Florida would be protected as tenants by entireties property because his ownership interest would be characterized by Florida law. However, I do not have support for this conclusion. It will be interesting to see if the question is presented to a Florida appellate court.

Florida Homestead and Alimony

I received an inquiry from a New York resident who was subject to an alimony judgment. He wanted to know if Florida homestead laws protect against alimony judgments. His plan was to make himself a Florida resident, invest money into a Florida homestead, and then tell the New York judge he had no money to pay alimony in the hope that the court could not put a lien for alimony on his protected Florida homestead.

The plan won't work. While a court could not put a lien on a Florida homestead to satisfy an alimony (or child support) award, the family courts have other methods of eliciting payment. For example, the New York court could order payment of alimony, and if the individual did not pay, after putting available cash into the homestead, the court could hold him in contempt of court. Continued failure to pay could result in arrest and imprisonment for contempt of court.

Homestead protection is effective against civil judgments, including marital settlement decrees, but it does not stop courts from taking other measures to enforce awards of alimony or child support.

Is There A Time Limit on Tax Liability?

IRS debt is like no other debt; the IRS has unique collection remedies, and asset protection strategies that work against civil judgments provide no barrier against the IRS. Clients occasionally asks whether there is any point after which the IRS cannot prosecute a collection action to recover past due taxes. There is a ten year statute of limitations against collections by the IRS. This means that in 2004, the IRS can take action collect taxes due or assessed within the past ten years. There are many other rules which could extend the IRS's reach. For examples, delays in assessment of taxes, extensions granted to the taxpayer, an agreed installment payment plan, and other types of IRS procedures can make the statute of limitations effectively longer than ten years. A taxpayer owing back taxes can ask the IRS to provide a tax transcript which provides a comprehensive history of tax payments and liability

Limited Partnership Pitfalls

Using partnerships for asset protection is complicated and subject to traps. Many people form family limited partnerships for asset protection purposes. Family limited partnerships require a general partner who is liable for partnership obligations whereas limited partners are not liable for acts or debts of the partnership. Wary of naming themselves, individually, as general partner where they could theoretically expose themselves to liability for the partnership, many people create a corporation to be general partner of their family limited partnership. The corporation acts as a shield which protects the client from liability for partnership obligations. In most cases, the client or client and spouse own the stock in the corporation. The problem is that if the client is sued individually, his limited partnership interests are protected from his judgment creditors (charging lien remedy), but his stock in the general partner corporation is fully exposed. The creditor will seize the stock in the general partner; gain control over the partnership; and thereafter, distribute partnership property where it will be seized by the creditor's charging order

Continue Reading...

Florida Residency Guide

People frequently asks me about what steps are necessary to become a Florida resident. The State of Florida has a website which provides a Florida residency guilde. It explains the requirements and the process of obtaining Florida residency. State of Florida.com - Florida Residency Guide

Protecting Family Business Corporations

Family businesses should be planned with asset protection in mind. In previous post on this blog I have strongly suggested using limited liability companies in lieu of corporations for new businesses for reasons which will not here be repeated. In the event a family has an existing corporate business owned by both spouses, there are still planning possibilities to protect the corporate shares from creditors.

Continue Reading...

Asset Protection Overkill

Beware of complicated asset protection solutions. I was contacted by a gentlemen today who was not a citizen or resident of the United States, but who spent a few months each year touring the country in a mobile home. He has not assets or businesses in the U.S. Nevertheless, some asset protection "advisor" sold this gentleman on using a Swiss Insurance Company to provide asset protection against U.S. lawsuits. Offshore insurance companies are effective and very sophisticated asset protection techniques, and they are important tools in some complicated cases. But for this case, the advise was extreme overkill. The advisor appears to be more interested in "selling" expensive product than giving reasonable advice. Few attorneys who practice asset protection would advise an expensive and sophisticated asset protection vehicle client who has very limited exposure to liability or creditors in the United States. The lesson in this case is that the most complicated and sophisticated legal plan is not always the best plan. Asset protection should be geared to the client's specific situation, and the fancy and complicated planning should be used only for those clients whose asset mix and legal exposure requires the top level of asset protection work.

Choice of Business Entity For Attorneys and Doctors

A professional cannot use a corporate shield to protect himself from malpractice. A professional is anyone who under Florida law is required to obtain a license in order to practice their trade. Florida statutes provide for distinct entities engaged in a professional business. These entities are a Professional Corporation or Association (commonly known as a P.A.) and a Professional Limited Liability Company. (abbreviated P. L. C. or L. C.) . A professional corporation or limited liability company by statute may only be owned by one or more licensed professionals. The rules for doctors and lawyers are different. Lawyers' P.A.s or their P.L.C.s may only be owned by one or more attorneys according to the cannons of legal ethics. Physicians are not so restricted. A physician can create a standard, non-professional entity to house their medical practice. This is a distinct advantage for physicians because the professional entity statutes include many restrictions or transfer. Physicians can also use this flexibility to better protect their ownership interest in their medical practice by , for example, owning their practice with their spouses jointly as tenants by the entireties. Florida statutes specifically authorizes ownership of a medical practice by the spouse, parent, or child of a licensed health care practitioner. I do not see any reason why a physician would choose to own his practice through a professional association or a professional limited liability company.

Limited Liability Partnerships

I've said this many times and to many people, but it needs to be repeated. In 1999, the Florida legislature pased CS/HB 361 amending Florida Statutes 620.8101 to provide, among other things, for limited liability partnerships (LLP) and limited liability limited partnerships (LLLP). The LLP is a general partnership where none of the partners has individual liability for the acts of the partnership. An LLLP is a limited partnership where the general partner is no longer personally liable for the acts of the limited partnership. The latter is particularly important for asset protection planning. Formerly, in the "old days", attorneys formed limited partnerships with a corporate general partner so that no individual would expose themselves to personal liability as general partner. The general partner of an LLLP is protected by the above statute from liability for the acts of the limited partnership. Therefore, an individual general partner of a limited liability limited partnership exposes himself to no individual liability.

Continue Reading...

Protection of Annuity Income

Most people seeking asset protection know that annuities owned by Florida residents are protected from creditors by Florida Statute 222.14. The protection is afforded to the annuity owner, the annuitant, and the income beneficiary of the annuity. I was recently asked to explain what happens to the annuity "asset protection" when an the annuity begins to pay out an income stream to the beneficiary and the beneficiary has creditors with judgments? Can a creditor seize annuity proceeds after they are paid out and in the hands of the beneficiary. Florida courts have held that annuity payments deposited in a beneficiary's bank account retain protection from creditors so long as the funds can be traced to the annuity

Welfare Benefit Plans: Watch Out !

Some insurance agents and financial planners are marketing something called a "welfare benefit plan" or a "419 Plan" (named after Section 419 of the Code). these plans are typically marketed to business owners to provide income tax savings and employee benefits through the use of insurance. Many of these plans sold are abusive shemes to evade income tax, although some may qualify for tax benefits. The plans always involve the sale of insurance and insurance commissions. If you are promised huge up-front tax deductions by participating in one of these 419 Plans be very careful and make sure you seek independent legal advise.

For purposes of this Blog, a 419 Plan is not covered by the Florida statute that protects from creditors IRAs and certain tax qualified retirement plans. Generally, a 419 Plan, a/k/s Welfare Benefit Plan does not provide effective asset protection under Florida law.

Life Insurance Confusion

Some people are confused about the protection from creditors afforded to life insurance owned by Florida residents. Florida statutes state that cash value of life insurance, in whatever form, owned by the insured is exempt from the owner's creditors. The insurance policy in question must be owned by the same person insured by the policy. For instance, if a husband owns a life insurance policy on the life of his spouse, and the policy has accumulated significant cash value, that cash value is not exempt from the husband's (owner's) creditors. However, if the husband's policy insured his own life the cash value would be protected from creditors under the subject Florida statue.

Continue Reading...

Underestimating Government Creditors- again!

People seeking asset protection continuously underestimate the intelligence and powers of their creditors, especially government creditors.. A case in point is a client who consulted with me in March about potential lawsuits by private individuals and one or more government agencies seeking civil remedies. My advise was that the particular creditors, and particularly the government agencies, would within a week or two attempt to freeze all their bank accounts, deposits with attorneys, credit cards and any other means of financial support and legal defense. I suggested making sure enough cash was set aside in a safe place to pay his litigation attorneys and to pay living expenses. Thereafter, the client consulted a tall-building law firm which advised the client that if certain steps were taken the creditors would have no right to freeze assets prior to a lawsuit and judgement. Guess what happened.

Continue Reading...

Instant Florida Residency?

Someone presently domiciled outside of Florida asked whether they could do something in Florida which would allow them to be a Florida resident and still work and live in their present domicile. The answer is clearly "no way." There is no instant Florida residency, and Florida residency is not portable. Florida residency requires demonstrated intent to make Florida your permanent and primary place of residency. True, many Floridians work in other states, are at school in other States, or they live in other States part of or most of the year. But, these people either own Florida real estate, have previously lived here full time, or have other facts which give them Florida roots. One cannot come into Florida, fill out drivers license and voters registration form and a declaration of Florida domicile, and then turn around on the next plane back home with Florida residency in their pocket. Courts have often said that Florida's asset protection laws are not available to tourists.

Liability For Your Child's Car Accidents

Most parents accompany their children to get the child's first drivers license at age 16. Did you know that this trip to the licensing agency with your minor child could expose you to serious liability. Under Florida Statute 322.09 the application of a child for a driver's license must be signed and verified by a aprent or any other adult who is willing to assume obligations imposed by Statute 322.09 (2). The reference subsection (2) states that any negligence or willful misconduct of a minor under the age of 18 when driving shall be imputed "to the person who has signed the application of such minor for a permit or license, which person shall be jointly and severally liable with such minor for any damages caused by such negligence or misconduct.

Continue Reading...

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Is it Something to Worry About?

Many clients who have established a business as a corporation, or even better, as a limited liability company are worried that their creditors who obtain a judgment will be able to pierce the corporation and attack their personal assets. This creditor tactic is referred to as piercing the corporate veil.

Continue Reading...

Married Couple Living in Two States

Interesting legal problem today involving a husband who was moving to Florida to find new work and a new house. His wife wanted to remain in another state with their child until the child finished high school. The couple had retained separate lawyers in contemplation of a divorce. Both husband and wife had significant creditor problems on the horizon. The state where they lived currently had almost no creditor exemptions. The problem was how to let husband maximize use of Florida's liberal asset protection exemptions, especially our homestead exemption, and still get wife enough money to support herself. Here is part of my proposed plan...

Continue Reading...

Protection of Federal Targets

I had a call from a prospective client who says his company is under investigation by the Security and Exchange Commission, and he wants to move money to an offshore trust. He asked whether this would protect his money from the SEC investigation.

Continue Reading...

Orlando Bankruptcy Attorney : Florida Bankruptcy Law

Nobody wants to file bankruptcy. Yet, many people find that when creditors pile late fees upon penalties on top of card balances it becomes impossible to climb out of debt, and they end up working for their creditors. Most people explore all possible alternatives before even considering personal bankruptcy. Those who must declare bankruptcy often feel uneasy or ashamed about their financial situation. In today's financial environment, however, bankruptcy is no longer the stigma it was decades ago. . Millions of consumers seek bankruptcy protection each year, and most lenders and employers are much more tolerant of bankruptcy than they were years ago.

I often tell clients that bankruptcy is easier and less disturbing than they imagine. Most bankruptcy debtors never appear in court before a judge, and for most, bankruptcy is primarily government paperwork. Florida law provides generous bankruptcy exemptions which protect your most valuable assets including your homestead and retirement savings. For people with overwhelming debt and little or no non-exempt assets at risk , bankruptcy is the best way to protect their families and to move beyond present difficulties.

If you want more information about bankruptcy in Orlando, Florida area, or want general information about laws concerning Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, visit AlperLaw.com : Bankruptcy Basics or the Florida Bankruptcy Law Blog.

Creditors Can Take Your Lawsuit

One problem of having a judgment entered against you is that the creditor's attorneys can attack any lawsuit you have, or any claim which you may have in the future, against any third party. For example, if you have an unsatisfied judgment and you are subsequently injured because of someone else's negligence, you will likely seek a lawyer to sue the other party or their insurance company. If a pre-existing creditors finds out about your lawsuit, or even your claim before you hire an attorney to file suit, your judgment creditor can seize your right to sue. Thereafter, any compensation you might otherwise be entitled to collect because of your injury would go to your creditor to pay your judgment in full before you would see any money. Your potential claims and your lawsuits against others are important and sometimes valuable assets which must be covered in your asset protection plan.

Homestead and IRS

A prospective client called and asked whether the Florida homestead protection extends to IRS debts where the IRS debt pertains to one of the two spouses who own the homestead. While Florida's homestead is a broad and strong asset protection shield, it does not offer full protection against IRS taxes. The IRS can put a lien on homestead property to collect taxes. While the IRS cannot force a sale of the residence to collect taxes, the tax lien would remain a recorded encumbrance, and whenever the house is sold, the taxes, plus accrued interest and penalties would have to be paid before the homeowner received any sales proceeds.

Not All Retirement Plans Are Protected

Retirement plans that are established under a body of federal law referred to as ERISA ( Employee Reitement Security Act of 1974) are protected from creditors pursuant to Florida Statute 222.21. These protected plans include most profit sharing plans, money purchase plans, 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans to which employers make contributions and defined benefit plans. Traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs are asset protected. However, retirement plans that only cover owner-employees are generally not protected from creditors by Florida statutes. Additionally, church plans, government plans, and many deferred comp plans may not be protected.

Supercharged Creditors

There are some creditors against whom asset protection is extremely difficult. These creditors include government agencies such as the IRS, SEC, and FTC, and your spouse. Government creditors are provided by Congress with extraordinary collection remedies. A federal agency can often lien property or freeze accounts without warning and without posting a bond if they suspect you of wrongdoing. Essentially government creditors can attack suspected wrongdoers like the mob in an old western movie, "lets hang 'em and then we'll try 'em." Even the most sophisticated offshore planning and moving cash to offshore accounts is not a foolproof asset protection against the government. The other creditor with powers far beyond those of mortal civil creditors is your spouse. Marital courts are have powers of equity, which means in this context, the judge can give whatever property you have to your spouse as part of a separation decree even if the asset is otherwise protected from civil judgment creditors.

Continue Reading...

Can Parent's Gift to Child Be Protected From Child's Creditors?

I recently saw a question concerning a parent who wanted to give money to a child, but where the child had judgment creditors due to the child's failed business. The parent wanted suggestions how to give money to help the child without the gift being seized by the child's creditors.

A few suggestions come to mind. First, the parent could fund an annuity for the child. The child's interest in the annuity is exempt from creditors under Florida statutes. The annuity could be purchase from an insurance company or the parent could create a private annuity. Both are protected. Second, the parent could create and fund a trust for the child's benefit with an independent trustee. The trust agreement could provide that money be distributed to the child or for his benefit, but specifically prohibit any distribution to the child's creditors. If the trust agreement were otherwise properly drafted, the money should be protected from the child's creditors.

Beware Offshore Tax Scams

An Utah man will spend 10 years in federal prison for scamming more than 50 investors out of nearly 15 million dollars. Kirk Koskella was sentenced earlier this month in Utah for his role in setting up honey "offshore trusts" in the 90's to reduce tax liability for investors in several states. Koskella is the first of eight people charged in the Ponzi-type scheme to be sentenced.

The story illustrates, once again, the offshore trust planning should not be used to hide money from the IRS or as part of any attempt to reduce income tax liability.

Asset Protection Through LLC

Florida limited liability companies (LLC) are a popular tool in business planning. Many lawyers use the LLC as an alternative to the Subchapter S corporation as the preferred legal entity for new businesses. Asset protection attorneys also use the LLC as a legal tool for domestic asset protection planning. Membership interests in a limited liability company are not exempt from execution or attachment by judgment creditors, but Florida law gives creditors limited remedies against a debtor's LLC interest. A judgment creditor cannot attach an LLC member's interest. A judgment creditor cannot seize assets owned by the LLC to satisfy a judgment against any one of the LLC's owners. In a properly drafted LLC agreement, the creditor has no rights to inspect the books and records of the LLC.

Continue Reading...

Need For Florida Asset Protection

Asset protection is a process of insulating your estate assets against attack by creditors and plaintiff's attorneys. In the United States there are more than one million lawyers, each with a license to file lawsuits against deep-pocket defendants by paying court filing fees of $150 or less. Too often, decisions by judges or juries are based more on emotion than on facts or the law, and frequently the result is a catastrophic damage award that wipes out a lifetime of hard work and investment. A well-designed asset protection plan builds a protective fort around the client's estate and guards family wealth from external creditor attack and frivolous lawsuits. The most effective asset protection fortress contains multiple layers of protection, so that even if they can defeat one device, there are other defenses around the family's nest egg. Asset protection is, therefore, an essential fundamental building block of financial planning.

Does Asset Protection Work

Many people question whether even the most complicated and sophisticated asset protection plan actually defeats creditor's claims, especially where the asset protection plan is designed and implemented close to a judgment being entered or a lawsuit being filed. Evaluating the effectiveness of asset protection depends on having realistic goals and objectives. If by asset protection a person means becoming 100 percent judgment proof, then successful asset protection is difficult, especially if not done several years before problems arise. If, however, one's goal is to substantially improve their creditor protection and to place the majority of their assets beyond creditor attack, then asset protection success is obtainable if done early and with the help of an experienced asset protection lawyer.

Continue Reading...

Homestead Protection

In Florida, our home is truly our castle, a castle that is impenetrable by creditors. The Florida Constitution exempts homestead property from levy and execution by judgment creditors. Florida courts have liberally expanded definitions of homestead property which includes more than just a single family house. Condominiums, manufactured homes, and mobile homes are also afforded homestead protection. The Constitution defines homestead as one's principal place of residence up to one-half acre within a municipality and up to 160 contiguous acres in any county in Florida. To qualify for homestead protection, a debtor must be a Florida resident and must reside on the homestead property.

Continue Reading...

Pay on Death Accounts

Received an interesting question from a litigation attorney today about fraudulent conveyances. His client had a parent in the hospital with a short life expectancy. Received an interesting question from a litigation attorney today about fraudulent conveyances. His client had a parent in the hospital with a short life expectancy. The parent owns a 50% interest in a homestead property in Florida, and he has a $100,000 in a bank account designated pay on death to child. Question posed was whether parent should withdraw cash, give money to the child, in order to avoid the hospital and doctors going after the money to pay medical bills.

Continue Reading...

Good Resource Link

A very good source of articles on asset protection planning is available on the website of attorney, Alan Gassman who practices in Clearwater, Florida. . Updates & Articles, Gassman & Associates, Clearwater, FL USA. Alan has posted many accurate articles on his site about many aspects of asset protection. Particulaly helpful are his postings related to medical practice, medical regulation, and physician asset protection.