Appellate Mediation Leads To More Successful Mortgage Modifications According To Tampa Foreclosure Attorney

One of my asset protection client introduced me to an attorney in Tampa, named Mike, who has a very large and successful practice defending mortgage foreclosures and negotiating mortgage modification. I spoke with Mike and asked him about his client’s experiences during court-ordered mediation with their mortgage lender during foreclosure litigation.

Mike said that mediation in state court proceedings is usually a waste of time for his clients. He listed several reasons why foreclosure mediation infrequently results in successful mortgage modification and foreclosure forbearance. For example, he said that there are so many foreclosure mediation that lenders usually send a foreclosure "clerk" with minimal authority to offer anything other than the lenders "in-the-box" standard modification packages for which, he said, few clients qualify. He said that the lender’s attorney see mediation as a temporary hurdle in their march toward foreclosure judgment and possession of the property. There are so many different state court judges with their own procedures that there is little uniformity how trial court’s treat mediation.

Mike said he is having success in mediation ordered by the appellate court. When an appeal is filed our appellate court (the Fifth District Court) orders almost all foreclosure cases to mediation. No briefs are due until mediation is completed. The attorney says lenders send more senior representatives to appellate mediation and they take more seriously mortgage mediation ordered by an appellate court. Appellate mediation is uniform because there is just one appellate court in our district.

The challenge is getting a foreclosure case to the appellate level. Mike lays the groundwork for appeal in response to lenders’ motions for summary judgment. He says that most trial courts ignore technical defects in lenders’ summary judgment motions because the trial judge wants to move his large foreclosure docket and get cases to their inevitable conclusion of a foreclosure judgment. Trial judges do not scrutinize foreclosure summary judgments as closely as they do in a typical civil case, according to Mike. Mike says that he uses technical summary judgment defenses which he anticipates may be overlooked by the trial court judge, but these technical defenses if ignored are the basis for an appeal. His clients can file and appeal and get to appellate mediation for a relatively small investment in legal fees.

I posted a blog article earlier this week about prospective bankruptcy court mediation in Chapter 13 cases. It will be interesting to see if bankruptcy mediation is, like appellate mediation, a better forum to negotiate mortgage modifications.

Orlando Bankruptcy Court May Empower Chapter 13 Debtors To Force Mediation With Their Mortgage Lenders: This Rule Could Avoid Many Foreclosures And Keep Many Homeowners In Their Family Home

The Orlando bankruptcy court is preparing to adopt a rule providing for mandatory mediation between homeowners and their mortgage companies to facilitate mortgage modification. Congress rejected a change in the bankruptcy code that would have empowered Chapter 13 debtors to force reduction in their first mortgage principal to their residence’s current fair market value.

This proposed procedural rule will not circumvent the bankruptcy code law and will not force reduction of first mortgage principal. What the Orlando local rule will do is enable Chapter 13 debtors by motion filed with the Orlando bankruptcy court to compel a bank representative with full authority to modify their mortgage to meet with the debtor and an independent mediator to negotiate in good faith a possible modification of the debtor’s first mortgage terms. This bankruptcy rule should make Chapter 13 bankruptcy attractive to homeowners who want to save their homes provided they can obtain a reasonable modification of their mortgage.

The Florida Supreme Court is requiring mediation in state court foreclosure cases. This state court rule is helpful, but the bankruptcy court rule could be better for homeowners. In state court procedures the homeowner has to be in a foreclosure case before having the opportunity to mediate with a bank agent with full authority. The homeowner first has to stop paying the mortgage for at least three months, wait for the bank to file a foreclosure lawsuit, hire a civil attorney to answer the lawsuit, proceed for several months in civil litigation, and then at some point, arrange for a court ordered mediation.

Chapter 13 mediation should be faster and more definitive. A debtor probably can get an order requiring mediation with their mortgage lender very soon after filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. The borrower/debtor will not have to miss several mortgage payments and fall farther behind on their mortgage. The bankruptcy rule probably will permit a court order adopting any mediated mortgage modification which order can be recorded in the public real estate records.

I will report on the details of the Chapter 13 mortgage mediation as they become available. However, the bankruptcy procedure may provide homeowners more negotiating power and a much quicker resolution of mortgage problems.

Florida Bar Program Should Help Homeowners Negotiate With Mortgage Lenders

The Florida Bar is trying to do something to help relieve the foreclosure logjam in Florida courts. The Florida Bar News reports that the Bar’s foreclosure task form is urging the Florida legislature to adopt the Bar’s “managed mediation program.” The mediation program administers foreclosure cases under a separate case management program and which requires mediation between homeowner and lender in contested foreclosure cases. The program calls for the lender to pay the $750 mediation fee.

The managed mediation procedure makes it possible for courts to handle foreclosure cases more efficiently. The Bar article states that foreclosures constitute about 75% of civil court dockets. More importantly, mediation procedure mandates participation by a lender representative with authority to settle foreclosure cases.

I have found that one of biggest problems my own clients  have experienced dealing with troubled real estate is their inability to communicate with a lender employee who has the authority to make decisions on mortgage modification, short sale, deeds in lieu, and other settlements. When mediation is required, the homeowner is assured his opportunity to communicate with a lender agent with authority to make a decision. Mediation, I think, helps upside down homeowners negotiate release from liability or a meaningful mortgage modification.
 

 

posted by Jonathan Alper, asset protection and bankruptcy attorney, Orlando, Florida