Creditor Cannot Garnish IRS To Get Your Tax Withholding Or Refunds

If you have paid money to the IRS to cover estimated future tax liability, can a judgment creditor ask the IRS to turn over the money the IRS is holding on your account? One of my clients has in his possession a large amount, over $1 million,  of U.S. Savings bonds. He understands that a prospective judgment  creditor may be able to attack the bonds. The client wants to cash out the bonds and take other measures to protect the cash. If he redeems the bonds, he says, the bank will pay the IRS money to cover his estimated tax liability on the savings bond interest. He wants to know if a creditor could get the money the IRS is holding for an uncertain future tax liability.

Federal law prohibits civil judgment creditors from garnishing the IRS. Creditors cannot garnish tax refunds in the IRS’s possession. Some debtors seek protection of cash by advance payment, or overpayment, of future tax liability. In bankruptcy, a prospective tax refund is property of your bankruptcy estate and must be turned over to the bankruptcy trustee when received from the IRS. A trustee cannot take the money from the IRS before the refund is issued to the debtor.
 

Changing S Corporation to LLC: Tax Effect Of Merger And Conversion

LLCs provide better asset protection of the owners’ interest than do corporations. Many asset protection plans involve changing a clients’ existing Subchapter S corporations to an LLC taxable as an S corp. There are two ways to do this. One way is to create a new LLC and then file articles of conversion which turn the corporation into the new LLC. The corporation turns into an LLC and all corporation assets automatically transfer to the LLC The other way is to merge the corporation into an existing LLC which already has assets. When the corporation has assets with built-in appreciation the there is an income tax issue with this plan. The issue is whether the change to the corporation accelerates income tax.

This past week one of my clients was considering whether he wanted to convert a corporation to a new LLC or merge the same corporation with an existing LLC. He asked me whether the IRS treats the merger and conversion differently with respect to taxation of built in appreciation in corporation assets. As I am not a tax attorney I had to reach out for the answer.

 

I consulted with my asset protection CPA, Lonnie Young of Orlando, Florida. Mr. Young explained that a merger into an LLC or a conversion to an LLC are treated the same for income tax purposes. He said that if the LLC has elected taxation as a sub-S corporation and the ownership of the LLC is  the same as the ownership of the corporation, neither the merger nor the conversion has adverse income tax consequences.

This particular client would have a tax problem with his plan. He owned 100% of his corporation stock, but he wanted a two member LLC for asset protection. Adding the LLC owner would cause a tax issue.
 

Income Tax Effect Of Mortgage Foreclosure On Upside Down Real Estate

A caller asked me whether imputed income after a foreclosure on an investment home when the owner had taken the home off the rental market for a year before the foreclosure. I’ve written previously on this about the income tax effect of foreclosure and 1099 debt forgiveness on rental properties. I’ve stated that my own accountant, Mr. Lonnie Young of Lake Mary, Fl, told me that 1099 income on rental property can be offset by investment losses so that foreclosure and debt forgiveness usually will not increase income taxes. This caller was concerned that his removal of the property from the rental market and subsequent vacancy, would disqualify the property as a "rental property."

I posed this question to Mr. Young. Here is a summary of his explanation of the general income tax rules for mortgage foreclosure and his answer to the caller's question. Assume one real estate investor (I’ll call him "Moe") purchases non-income producing property, such as vacant land, and his friend (I’ll call him "Larry") invests in income producing rental property, such as vacant land.. Assume that both Moe and Larry lose their properties at foreclosure sales, that both properties are "upside down" and that both taxpayers receive a 1099 income form from their respective lenders representing imputed income for debt forgiveness.

Mr. Young explained that Moe’s investment in non-income producing property is a capital investment for future appreciation. Moe’s losses in his real estate investment is a "capital loss" which can offset his capital gains for that year, but Moe’s capital loss greater than his capital gain for same year can offset only a small amount ($3,000) of other income in that year, with the balance carried forward to future years.

Larry’s investment in his rental property is a business for production of income; this investment is similar for taxes to other typical small businesses such as a landscape business or flower shop. Any losses Larry incurs in his business may offset any other income Larry earns that year. Therefore, Larry can offset his 1099 income from the foreclosure sale with the full loss he incurred which is at least the difference between his adjusted tax basis and the lower fair market value at time of foreclosure sale.

If, after foreclosure, the mortgage company did not issue a 1099 statement Larry might still claim a loss against his other income that year, but if in later years the mortgage company did issue a 1099 then Larry would realize imputed income without an offsetting loss having previously deducted the loss. Mr. Young said that regardless of whether Larry’s lender issues a 1099 Larry can recognize the imputed income and offsetting loss in the year of the foreclosure sale.

If, as in the case of the caller mentioned above, Larry removed the house from the rental market because he could not find a suitable tenant, or if management and maintenance expenses exceeded market rents, for example, Mr. Young believes Larry’s property would still be business rental property in most cases. If Larry originally purchased the property to produce rental income the property would retain its "business nature" even if market conditions led to operating losses.

This is all I know about the income tax effect of foreclosure on upside down investment property. Please don’t ask me any more questions. If you have any questions you should call your CPA, or if you don’t have a smart CPA, then call Lonnie Young. 407 936-2500.